Opinion: In support of Supervisor Joel Engardio - a call for reason and respect in our civic process

As long-time residents of District 4, me and my neighbors feel compelled to speak out in defense of our current Supervisor, Joel, whose contributions to our community have been significant, responsible, and visionary.
Since taking office, Supervisor Joel has worked hard to uplift our neighborhoods. He has actively supported small businesses, helped organize night markets to stimulate the local economy, and accelerated long-delayed infrastructure projects, such as the T-Line Rail improvements-projects left unresolved by previous leadership. These are not minor achievements; they reflect a commitment to progress and responsiveness.
In the face of growing environmental concerns, Supervisor Joel also advocated for the transformation of the Great Highway into a coastal park, a move driven by scientific findings on ocean erosion and the long-term need for preservation. This was not a unilateral decision - it was supported by over 50% of voters in a public referendum. Many of us, including numerous neighbors and friends, believe this is a forward-thinking plan for the future.
And yet, despite these accomplishments, a group of individuals, motivated not by constructive disagreement, but seemingly by political agendas, are now pushing to recall Supervisor Joel over this single issue. This action is not only deeply unfair, but sets a dangerous precedent.
We must consider the broader implications:
1. Is this a misuse of the recall process?
Recall is a democratic right, but it should not be wielded as a tool for pushing decisions some disagree with. Using it in this way erodes trust in public institutions and creates a climate where long-term planning becomes nearly impossible.
2. Are we ignoring the totality of his service?
Leadership should be evaluated holistically. Dismissing all the good work Joel has done simply because of one policy dispute shows a lack of appreciation for effective governance and community investment.
3. Are we dividing our community further?
This recall effort is not fostering constructive dialogue. It is creating animosity and polarization. We should be uniting to face our challenges – not turning neighbors into adversaries.
4. Can we afford this distraction during a financial crisis?
With the city facing economic hardship and budget deficits, we need steady leadership and pragmatic solutions. A recall campaign wastes precious time, energy and public resources when we should be focusing on rebuilding our economy and infrastructure.
A Call To Our Community:
Supervisor Joel Engardio deserves fairness, not political sabotage. Whether you agree with every decision he has made or not, we must recognize the value of thoughtful, engaged leadership.
If we allow recall campaigns to be triggered every time someone disagrees with a policy, we risk paralyzing our city’s ability to govern at all.
Let us stand up for integrity in public service. Let us stand against unnecessary division. And most importantly, let us stand together for the future of our community.
*Connie Leung is a Sunset District resident for nearly 40 years.
- Six power outages in Sunset District impact residents and businesses among strings of outages in San Francisco in Dec. 2025
- California bans all plastic carryout bags at retail stores starting January 1, 2026, only allows recycled paper bags to be distributed to customers
- If someone’s vehicle blocks your driveway, San Francisco's 311 service will resolve it easier and safer for you
- U.S. Department of Homeland Security proposes green card status can be denied for Medicaid and SNAP recipients
- NAPCA Column 18: About the One Big Beautiful Bill Act
- San Francisco Real-Time Investigation Center (RTIC) equipped with drones and advanced technologies now fully operates to help keep the city safe
- The community blessed for two Chinese American Police Chiefs in a row to lead San Francisco Police Department
- San Francisco newly-appointed D4 Supervisor Alan Wong votes for Family Zoning Plan in his first full board meeting





